Communicating Effectively Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Communicating Effectively - Essay ExampleThe prevalence of the ism in the country led to an increase in commerce feuds owing to the shortfalls it presented. On the contrary, the doctrine also expedited the process of terminating contracts between employers and employees thus minimizing the duration some(prenominal) spend together especially in relationships that strain either party. This implies that the doctrine has a number of advantages and disadvantages to either party depending on the prevailing circumstances as the discussion below portrays.Key among the advantages of the employment and will doctrine is the fact that it enhances the process of resolving contract breaches. Contracts are legal agreements that bind both parties to unique(predicate) terms and responsibilities. A breach refers to the inability of one party to remain faithful to the terms of the contract thereby causing either financial loses or inconveniences to the otherwise party. Resolving contract breaches is always a detailed process characterized by hectic court cases. The employment at will doctrine, on the other hand, provides an aggrieved party the freedom to evaluate the nature of the breach and to terminate the agreement. Such terminations of agreement are easy and timely thus preventing any further inconveniences.Additionally, the employment at will doctrine provides the employers with the freedom to hire and fire employees at their peril. Such is a vital provision that employers use to enhance the profitability in their companies. The freedom to fire employees at will is among the most prudent ways of dealing with difficult employees. As such, the employer can fire an employee owing to his attitude and productivity. As such, the rest of the employees strive to enhance their productivity in order to earn the favor of the employer. This way, employers enhance the profitability of their ventures. The doctrine provides employees with a degree of flexibility in their places of wor k (Ford, Kerry and Richard 102). An