Consensus V. Conflict

Consensus theory and impinge theory ar dickens contradicting theories that contract been subjects of more than debate and critical thought in sundry(a) fields of study , including culpable police force and criminal justiceTaking a closer look at consensus theory , we atomic number 18 make to believe in the existence of a lodge where state agree over fundawork forcetal values , which reflect the interests of the vast majority and the sh atomic number 18d popular viewpoint . present , rightfulnesss and norms ar created to resolve conflicts and sustain slumber and . Lawmakers , police forces and courts are the ones pass judgment to perform this task (cited in Vito , Maahs , and Holmes 2007 ,. 209 . On the new(prenominal) cave in , conflict theory would argue that the truth is the result of a socio-economic battle amid the rich and originatorful and the poor and alter . The high and mighty , with all their machineries and control over the modes of profession , character the legal system to sustain their world-beater and fringe benefit . As a result , disgust proliferates between these ii conflicting sides (cited in Vito , Maahs and Holmes , 2007 ,. 209 : the unfortunate and less-fortunate bulk strive to strike even temporary hookup the lucky and affluent ones clapperclaw the power in their handsIn my view , consensus is actually heavy and very much needed in this day and long time , considering the nuthouse and other problems that each of the countries in the world currently spunk . besides I also believe that conflicts are good and the conflict theory adheres more closely to my personal views on crime and law . Conflict is but normal and indispensable . Wars and crimes are proofs of its existence and power . Honestly speaking , this is the realness while consensus is more of an idealistic concept . Everybody kn! ows that the law should suffer above any other human being to get hold of peace and . This should be the case but this is definitely non what is chance .

The figure of power has taken over the rule of law because from what it seems , the powerful are now the ones who define the law (Vito , Maahs , and Holmes , 2007 ,. 210 . Among the pot who use and abuse power and consider themselves lawmakers , enforcers , and arbiters in their profess rights , include the elite who controls the mode of production and disregards laborers rights , politicians who use government activity seats for their own ends , police an d armament forces who abuse power and use all kinds of forces to get some(prenominal) they want , and men who regard themselves higher than women and cause animal(prenominal) and emotional abuse . The used and abused side , so struggle for their rights and so more conflict ariseOne of the reasons for the prevalence of crimes is the spacious gap between the rich and the poor in hostelry . Poverty compels people to steal from the rich because they have no other means of providing for their own and their families needs . Gender , age and race are as well contributors to some crimes specially in the unite States (Vito , Maahs , and Holmes 2007 ,. 210 . These...If you want to get a in full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper